AI and the New Challenges Facing Educational Testing with UMass Amherst’s Stephen Sireci
In this episode of Tried and Tested, host Isabelle Gonthier, PhD, ICE-CCP speaks with Stephen G. Sireci, Ph.D., Distinguished Professor and Executive Director of the Center for Educational Assessment at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, about AI and the new challenges facing educational testing. Drawing on his work in psychometrics, validity, fairness, educational measurement, and test development, Stephen explores how AI is reshaping what assessment professionals can do, and what they must continue to scrutinize carefully.
As generative AI becomes part of test development, scoring, translation, accessibility, reporting, and candidate preparation, this conversation examines what should change and what must remain foundational. Stephen discusses how assessment can better support learning, why AI outputs still require human interrogation, and what personalization means for long-standing ideas of standardization. He also explores validity evidence in AI-supported workflows, cultural and linguistic fairness, micro-credentials, and why validity research remains essential to the future of the testing profession.
What you’ll learn:
- How AI is expanding what assessment professionals can do across the testing lifecycle
- Why assessments are increasingly being used to support learning, not only measure it
- What personalized assessment models could mean for validity, fairness, and traditional ideas of standardization
- Why AI outputs need to be interrogated, evaluated, and supported by evidence
- How AI may affect test development, scoring, alignment, translation, and accessibility
- What candidate use of AI means for defining the construct being assessed
- Where cultural and linguistic context matters when applying AI in assessment
- Why validity research remains central as testing programs adopt new technologies
Who should listen:
- Educational testing and assessment leaders evaluating AI-enabled change
- Psychometricians and measurement professionals focused on validity and fairness
- Test developers exploring AI-supported item development, scoring, or alignment
- Credentialing and certification leaders considering AI’s impact on workforce skills
- Language assessment and multilingual testing professionals
- Researchers and graduate students working in educational measurement
- Organizations balancing innovation, defensibility, and public trust in testing
Stephen Sireci
Professor and Executive Director of the Center for Educational Assessment in the College of Education
Stephen G. Sireci, Ph.D. is Distinguished Professor and Executive Director of the Center for Educational Assessment in the College of Education, University of Massachusetts Amherst. He earned his Ph.D. in psychometrics from Fordham University and his master and bachelor degrees in psychology from Loyola College Maryland. Before UMass, he was Senior Psychometrician at GED Testing Service, Psychometrician for the CPA Exam and Research Supervisor of Testing for the Newark NJ Board of Education. He is known for his research in validity and fairness of educational tests, and for innovations in test development. He currently serves/has served on several advisory boards including the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards, Duolingo English Test, and technical advisory committees for Florida, Maryland, New Hampshire, New York, Montana, Puerto Rico, and Texas. He is a Fellow of American Educational Research Association and of Division 5 of American Psychological Association, and a lifetime member of the National Academy of Education. He is a past President of International Test Commission, Northeastern Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. His UMass honors include School of Education’s Outstanding Teacher Award, Conti Faculty Fellowship, Public Engagement Fellowship, Outstanding Accomplishments in Research and Creative Activity Award, and the Chancellor’s Medal. He also received the Messick Memorial Lecture Award from Educational Testing Service/International Language Testing Association. He serves on several editorial boards including Applied Measurement in Education, Educational Assessment, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, and Psicothema.